Peter Zhang Mar 05, 2026 01:44
Hall & Wilcox partner Steve Johns outlines three-phase framework for AI integration in law firms, from daily usage to reimagining client services.
Harvey AI, the legal-focused artificial intelligence platform, published a case study featuring Steve Johns, Partner and Co-head of Technology & Digital Economy at Australian law firm Hall & Wilcox, detailing how the firm measures AI implementation success across different time horizons.
The framework breaks down into three distinct phases, each with specific metrics and objectives that other professional services firms wrestling with AI adoption might find instructive.
Short-Term: Getting Lawyers to Actually Use It
Johns defines immediate success simply—broad adoption and daily usage across the firm. “AI forms part of the normal work experience rather than being treated as an experimental or niche tool,” he explained. The firm tracks active usage metrics, frequency of use, and completion of required training programs.
This might sound obvious, but it addresses a real problem. Many firms buy AI tools that end up gathering digital dust because partners never integrate them into their workflows.
Medium-Term: Embedding Into Core Operations
The second phase moves beyond mere usage to actual integration. Johns emphasizes AI should be “integrated into core internal workflows, templates, and processes, rather than sitting alongside them.”
Success metrics shift from usage statistics to outcomes: better and more consistent work product, faster turnaround times, and improved efficiency. Crucially, this phase includes developing use cases that support “legal analysis, judgment, and decision making rather than task execution.”
That distinction matters. Moving from AI as document reviewer to AI as analytical partner represents a significant capability jump.
Long-Term: Reimagining Legal Services
Johns’ long-term vision goes further than efficiency gains. He describes success as “reimagining and implementing different ways of providing legal services, as well as the types of services offered.”
For Harvey AI, publishing this framework serves a clear purpose—demonstrating that sophisticated law firms are thinking strategically about AI integration rather than treating it as a checkbox exercise. Hall & Wilcox, a mid-sized Australian firm with offices across the country, provides a relatable example for similar-sized practices evaluating AI investments.
The timing aligns with broader enterprise AI adoption trends, as professional services firms face increasing pressure to demonstrate technology competence to clients who are themselves deploying AI tools.
Image source: Shutterstock
